See how a grade was reached.
Review a criterion-by-criterion breakdown. Maths is checked mathematically first, and worked references help make partial credit consistent.
04 / Grade
Your expertise. A more aligned co-grader.
Your rubric choices, grading rationale, and corrections shape an AI partner that aligns with your approach. Two independent opinions and blind calibration keep that alignment open to review.
Q6 · WORKED MATHS
Find and classify the stationary point.
f(x) = x² − 4x + 3
GRADER A8/10
↔
GRADER B7/10
Correct derivative3 / 33 / 3
Finds the point4 / 44 / 4
Classifies the point1 / 30 / 3
Held for your review. Your call.
A PRACTICAL LOOK INSIDE
See it in action.
YOUR STANDARDS LEAD
Two opinions. A visible rationale.
Two independent AI graders assess each answer. Mathematical equivalence is checked first, and rubric criteria make partial credit and disagreements visible.
- Criterion-by-criterion marks, including the drawing itself for sketches.
- Identical answers receive identical grades.
- Edit a rubric to re-grade the question; manual marks remain protected.
EXAMLOCK / AI CO-GRADINGINTERACTIVE EXAMPLE
QUESTION 06 · CO-GRADINGHeld for review
OFFICIAL PROPOSAL8/10
↔SECOND OPINION7/10
✓ Equivalent maths checked first2(x + 1) ≡ 2x + 2
A second opinion you can inspect.
A worked reference supports partial credit. Both graders explain the marks through the rubric.
Disagreements are shown to you. Grades are never silently reconciled.
Illustrative product walkthrough · sample dataA CLOSER LOOK AT GRADE
Co-author. Co-grade. Calibrate to you.
Norm the grades against your judgment.
In Second Look, grade sample assessments before seeing AI marks. Compare rationale and scores, inspect disagreements, and focus first on students whose letter grade or pass/fail could change.
Fix once. Apply with confidence.
Edit a rubric to re-grade the question across the class. Manual grades stay protected, and results are held until you approve them.
2
independent AI graders. Your final decision.
Exports stay marked DRAFT until approval. Approving without a full review requires a written, logged reason.
Two independent AI graders+
Two models grade each answer independently. One provides the official proposed grade and the other a second opinion. Disagreements are shown to the instructor and never resolved silently.
- Instructor-aligned co-grading is shaped by co-authored rubrics, grading rationale, and corrections, with alignment checked through instructor-led review.
Maths checked mathematically first+
Equivalent answers are proven correct instantly. A pre-solved reference makes partial credit consistent. Showing work is expected by default, and calculus tiers apply.
Criterion-by-criterion grading+
Graded by the rubric, criterion by criterion, with the breakdown visible to the instructor.
Grade sketches from the drawing+
Sketches graded from the drawing: shape, intercepts, asymptotes, end behaviour.
Consistent grades for identical answers+
Identical answers always get identical grades.
Grades in seconds after submission+
Grades in seconds after a student submits.
Next up: Insights.
Turn the results into what comes next.
A FEW USEFUL ANSWERS
Questions, answered.
Can AI release grades without instructor approval?
Grades are held until an instructor approves them. Second Look brings grading disagreements, calibration, low-scoring questions, and integrity review into the same process. Exports remain marked DRAFT until approval.
What happens when the two AI graders disagree?
The disagreement is shown to the instructor with both grades and a criterion-level comparison. The instructor can select either opinion or enter a grade. Manual grades are protected from automatic regrading.
LET’S MAKE YOUR NEXT EXAM BETTERGood things start
Good things start
with a conversation.
Bring your assessment workflow. See how privacy-conscious proctoring and AI co-grading can support your teaching.